Judge Strikes Down Portion of Patriot Act

NEW YORK — Warning that “democracy abhors undue secrecy,” a federal judge struck down a Patriot Act provision today that he referred to as “an all-encompassing prophylactic rule.”

Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York struck down Section 505 of the Patriot act, ruling that the government should not be able to request records from internet service providers and then prohibit them from speaking about it.

The code in question allowed the FBI to send National Security Letters (NSLs) to businesses requesting information and prohibiting them “from disclosing to any person that the FBI has sought or obtained access to information or records under these provision.”

“Democracy abhors undue secrecy,” wrote Marrero in his 120-page decision. “Public knowledge secures freedom.”

“An unlimited government warrant to conceal […] has no place in our open society,” Marrero wrote.

The decision called to an end a case brought by the ACLU against the Justice Department that originally had to be filed under seal so as not to violate the provisions of the offending code.

“This is a landmark victory against the Ashcroft Justice Department’s misguided attempt to intrude into the lives of innocent Americans in the name of national security,” said ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero.

Marrero ruled that the law violated both the First Amendment’s protection against unconstitutional prior restraint and the Fourth Amendment’s protection action against unreasonable searches.

The judge also criticized the government for not providing a method of judicial review for the NSLs.

The decision is the second to strike a blow against the Bush administration’s anti-terrorist policies this summer.

In June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that terror suspects currently in custody can use the U.S. justice system to challenge their incarceration.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Releases Updated Age-Verification Toolkit

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the release of its updated age verification toolkit.

UK Moving Ahead with Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The U.K. government has announced its intent to follow through on criminalizing “choking” content, a plan that was announced earlier this year.

Italy to Require Age Verification for Adult Sites

Italian media regulator AGCOM has announced that all sites and platforms hosting adult content will be required to implement age verification systems starting Nov. 12 to prevent access by users under 18.

Russian Lawmakers Call for Age Verification

Two Russian lawmakers have called on the country’s government to implement age verification for adult content.

Canadian Privacy Commissioner Endorses National AV Bill

Philippe Dufresne, privacy commissioner of Canada, has voiced support for a bill that would impose fines of up to $500,000 on adult sites that do not implement age verification for Canadian viewers.

Industry Attorney Paul Cambria Retires After 50 Years of Practicing Law

After more than a half-century in practice, during which he provided the defense in some of the adult industry's most notable legal cases, attorney Paul Cambria has retired.

FSC: California's Device-Based AV Law Does Not Apply to Adult

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) put out an advisory today explaining that California's new device-based age verification law does not apply to adult websites.

Ohio AG Threatens Action Against 'Major' Adult Sites Over AV Law

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost announced today that his office is sending "notice of violation" letters to 19 adult websites for failure to comply with the state's recently enacted age verification law.

Ukrainian Content Creators on Hook for Nearly $10M in Back Taxes

Content creators in Ukraine owe the equivalent of $9.3 million in back taxes, according to the country's State Tax Service.

Updated: European Patent Office Board of Appeals Revokes EIS GmbH Patent

The European Patent Office (EPO) Board of Appeals last week ruled in favor of pleasure brand LELO in the company's ongoing dispute with Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH.

Show More